Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 19:51

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are the coolest new smart home gadgets to upgrade your living space?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
If Humans Become Extinct, This Is the Species That Will Take Over the Planet - The Daily Galaxy
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Phil Mickelson’s U.S. Open career likely ends with final bit of heartbreak - NBC Sports
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Weekend Box Office: LILO & STITCH Stays on Top as BALLERINA Opens to $25M - boxofficepro.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s on the Hamptons Status List? - The Cut
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?